Chorus of the Union
How Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas Set Aside Their Rivalry to Save the Nation
-
- Pre-Order
-
- Expected Jun 4, 2024
-
- $20.99
-
- Pre-Order
-
- $20.99
Publisher Description
An impassioned and timely exploration of Abraham Lincoln's long-time rivalry—and eventual alliance—with Stephen Douglas.
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas are a misunderstood duo. History remembers them as antagonists, and for most of the years the two men knew each other, they were. In the 1830s, they debated politics around the stove in the back of Joshua Speed’s store in Springfield, Illinois. In the 1850s, they disagreed over the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and debated slavery as opponents for a Senate seat. In 1860, they both ran for president.
Lincoln and Douglas ended as allies, though, against the greatest threat—slavery—that our country has ever faced. When Douglas realized he was going to lose the 1860 election, he stopped campaigning for himself and went South to persuade the slave states to accept Lincoln as president. After that effort failed, and the newly formed Confederate States of America bombed Fort Sumter, Douglas met with Lincoln to discuss raising an army.
The story of how Lincoln and Douglas put aside their rivalry to work together for the preservation of the Union has important lessons for our time. We have just been through a presidential election where the loser refused to concede defeat, with violent consequences. Not only did Douglas accept his loss, he spent the final days of his campaign barnstorming the country to build support for his opponent’s impending victory, setting aside his long-held desire for the presidency for the higher principle of national unity.
Also, by focusing on the importance of Illinois to Lincoln’s political development, Chorus of the Union will challenge the notion that he was an indispensable “great man.” Lincoln was the right person to lead the country through the Civil War, but he became president because he was from the right place. Living in Illinois provided Lincoln the opportunity to confront Douglas over the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The debates with Douglas during the 1858 Senate campaign brought him the fame and prestige to contend for the Republican presidential nomination in 1860. Lincoln's moderate views on slavery, which he developed in the swing region of a swing state, made him the ideal candidate for an election that had sweeping historical consequences.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
The political rivalry between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas fades away as the Union's future grows uncertain in this insightful account from historian McClelland (Young Mr. Obama). At the time of their famed 1858 Illinois Senate debates, Douglas was America's most controversial politician, McClelland explains. His 1854 sponsorship of the Kansas-Nebraska Act had made him "the leading exponent of popular sovereignty," an idea meant to justify the spread of slavery to new territories that had instead polarized the nation even further and drawn Lincoln back into Illinois politics to oppose Douglas. McClelland's account of the debates highlights how Douglas "tied logic into knots" to prove popular sovereignty was an organizing principle of American democracy—indeed, the book's great strength is its revealing portrait of Douglas, whose maddening contradictions and "both sides-isms" made him enemies in every quarter, including among fellow Democrats. During the 1860 Democratic convention, when the party devolved into chaos as Southern delegates set up competing conventions in an effort to promote popular sovereignty, Douglas, who was running for president, opposed the upstarts. He later pledged loyalty to the Union in an 1861 speech which McClelland contends was "the greatest argument... ever delivered on setting aside partisanship." Artfully blending biography and history, McClelland gives the "Little Giant" his due as a unifier. It's a wise examination of America's divisive antebellum politics.
