Airstream v. Cit Financial Services
1988.ID.15294; 768 P.2D 1302; 115 IDAHO 569
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
Most of the facts giving rise to this controversy are well set out in Airstream, Inc. v. CIT Financial Services, Inc., 111 Idaho 307, 723 P.2d 851 (1986) (Airstream I), which reversed a district court judgment in favor of Airstream, and remanded for a finding to ascertain CITs intent in the endorsement by one of its clerical employees (Kristin Haustveit) of a check delivered to it by the Boise Airstream dealer (Shuler), and also for findings relating to the usages of the trade and course of dealings between