Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine

Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine

344 F.3d 1234, 2003.CFC.0000222 , S.P.Q.2d 1280(68 U)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge RADER. AK Steel Corporation appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granting summary judgment that its U.S. Patent 4,800,135 was not infringed by Sollac and Ugine (collectively, ""Sollac"") and that certain claims of its U.S. Patent 5,066,549 are invalid. AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac, 234 F. Supp. 2d 711 (S.D. Ohio 2002). Because the court properly construed the patent claims and correctly found no genuine issues of material fact, we affirm.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
23 de septiembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
24
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
74.7
KB

Más libros de Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

[U] Looper v. Department of Defense [U] Looper v. Department of Defense
1994
[U] Lockhart v. Office of Personnel Management [U] Lockhart v. Office of Personnel Management
1995
[U] Dickerson v. Office of Personnel Management [U] Dickerson v. Office of Personnel Management
1995
[U] Elinzano v. Merit Systems Protection Bd. [U] Elinzano v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.
1995
[U] Grannum v. Department of Justice [U] Grannum v. Department of Justice
1995
[U] Dalton v. Murdock Mach. & Engineering Co. of Utah [U] Dalton v. Murdock Mach. & Engineering Co. of Utah
1995