Akandas, Inc. v. Klippel Akandas, Inc. v. Klippel

Akandas, Inc. v. Klippel

250 Kan. 458, 827 P.2d 37, KS.0042061(1992)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

The opinion of the court was delivered by The plaintiffs sought judgment that certain oil and gas leases
had expired. The resolution of that issue depends upon the
interpretation of a document entitled "Unitization Agreement." The plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest are mineral
interest owners who entered into oil and gas leases. Each lease
contains a habendum clause, specifying an initial or primary term
ranging from one month to five years and a secondary term for "as
long thereafter as oil or gas, or either, is produced from said
land" or words to that effect. None of the leases specifically
provides for entering into a unitization agreement.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1992
28 de febrero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
27
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
67.1
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Kansas

Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986
Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry
1975
State v. Williams & Reynolds State v. Williams & Reynolds
1975
State v. Cameron & Bentley State v. Cameron & Bentley
1975
Querry v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Querry v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
1975