Akridge v. Crow Akridge v. Crow

Akridge v. Crow

903 SO.2D 346, 30 FLA. L. WEEKLY D1480, 2005.FL.0002736

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

In this amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, the petitioners challenge as unconstitutional their confinement pursuant to Administrative Order 7-12.0, an order adopted by the circuit court in Polk County, which establishes a collections court program for the collection of fines, fees, and costs in all criminal cases. The nine named petitioners received and completed county jail sentences on misdemeanor offenses; however, each had fines, fees, and costs that remained unpaid for more than 120 days after they were sentenced. All nine were indigent when they were sentenced by the trial court. They petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus after being arrested and jailed for failing to pay, and thereafter failing to appear before the collections court. For the reasons explained below, we concluded that their detention was unconstitutional and issued an order granting their petition with an opinion to follow.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2005
15 de junio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
13
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
59.3
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Illinois

People v. Grammer People v. Grammer
1976
Electro-Motive Div. v. Indus. Com. Electro-Motive Div. v. Indus. Com.
1952
County of Du Page v. Graham County of Du Page v. Graham
1985
Chicago Park Dist. v. Downey Coal Co. Chicago Park Dist. v. Downey Coal Co.
1953
Halpin v. Scotti Halpin v. Scotti
1953
The People v. Moretti The People v. Moretti
1953