I.S. Joseph Co. v. Michigan Sugar Co. I.S. Joseph Co. v. Michigan Sugar Co.

I.S. Joseph Co. v. Michigan Sugar Co‪.‬

C08.40266; 803 F.2d 396 (1986)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. This case involves the question whether a party to a commercial arbitration agreement can be compelled to arbitrate with the assignee of the entity with which it first agreed to arbitrate. More specifically, we are called on to decide who -- the arbitrator or the court -- must determine the present validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement. The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota compelled arbitration without ruling on the validity of the assignment. The Court held that any objections to the assignment should be decided by the arbitration panel. We now reverse, for the underlying dispute here goes to the existence of a contract to arbitrate, and therefore is a question of substantive arbitrability to be decided by the courts.1

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1986
10 de octubre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
8
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
63.5
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Alexander United States v. Alexander
2005
United States v. Johnson United States v. Johnson
2005
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
2005
Lyons v. Luebbers Lyons v. Luebbers
2005
United States v. Thomas United States v. Thomas
2005
[U] United States v. Franklin [U] United States v. Franklin
2005