Jacqueline M. Heembrock v. David T

Plaintiff's suit against defendant stemmed from an alleged courtship and was in three counts seeking: (1) recovery of monies loaned defendant (2) recovery of monies expended by plaintiff for medical care and attention during her pregnancy, and (3) support and maintenance for her child. The trial court rendered judgment on Count I for $2248.00 and no appeal was taken, but plaintiff has appealed from the dismissals of Counts II and III. Her brief in neither ""Points Relied On"" nor ""Argument"" cites any authorities or arguments in support of the proposition that the court erred in dismissing Count II and must be considered as abandoned. Rafferty v. Levy, Mo. App., 153 S.W.2d 765; La Grange Reorganized School District No. R-VI v. Smith, Mo., 312 S.W.2d 135. Thus leaving the one ultimate question - is defendant civilly liable for the support and maintenance of his alleged child born out of wedlock?