O-J Transport Co. v. United States and Interstate Commerce Commission O-J Transport Co. v. United States and Interstate Commerce Commission

O-J Transport Co. v. United States and Interstate Commerce Commission

1976.C06.40198 536 F.2D 126

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

LIVELY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for review of a final order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) denying the application of petitioner O-J Transport Company (O-J) for a certificate of convenience and necessity under § 207(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 307(a). O-J is a small trucking company owned by two black residents of Detroit, Michigan. It has been engaged in hauling malt beverages from Milwaukee, Wisconsin to Detroit under temporary authority since September 1, 1973. Its application sought a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing transportation of automobile parts over irregular routes between designated points in the Detroit, Michigan area on the one hand and Chicago, Illinois and Janesville, Kenosha and Milwaukee, Wisconsin on the other, as well as the transportation of malt beverages between Milwaukee and Detroit. The Commission directed that a certificate issue for the transportation of malt beverages, but denied the application for authority to transport automobile parts. See O-J Transport Company Common Carrier Application, 120 M.C.C. 699 (1974). That portion of the order which granted the certificate for transportation of malt beverages is not before this court and our review is concerned only with the denial of O-Js application for authority to haul automobile parts.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1976
4 de junio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
13
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
76.6
KB

Más libros de United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit

United States v. Wesley United States v. Wesley
2005
Ross v. Wall Street Systems Ross v. Wall Street Systems
2005
[U] Higgins v. International Union [U] Higgins v. International Union
2005
Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Hammond Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Hammond
2004
In re Huffman In re Huffman
2004
Swix v. Daisy Manufacturing Co. Swix v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.
2004