Paul F. Murray v. Second District Court

Taken in the aggregate, proved charges that a civil service employee of a local board of health had failed to comply with required office procedure and to maintain proper work hours, had failed to administer the budget properly, had failed to supervise the office and its personnel properly, and had failed to conduct himself in a professional manner at a board meeting warranted a Conclusion by the Civil Service Commission that the employee's discharge from employment was justified. [512-515] An employee who had been dismissed from employment by a local board of health and whose discharge had been affirmed by the Civil Service Commission and by a District Court was not entitled to any relief from a single Justice of this court on the ground that the District Court Judge had affirmed the commission's decision despite its admission of certain evidence that was allegedly beyond the scope of the District Court's remand order to the commission, where the employee had failed to raise this issue before the commission and in the District Court. [515]