![Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Currin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Currin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Currin
1956.NC.40214; 92 S.E.2D 658; 244 N.C. 102
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
A motion to strike allegations from a pleading for irrelevancy admits, for the purposes of the motion, the truth of all facts well pleaded as well as all inferences which legitimately may be drawn from the facts alleged. The motion, however, does not admit conclusions of the pleader. Bank v. Bryan, 240 N.C. 610, 83 S.E.2d 485; Dixie Lines v. Grannick, 238 N.C. 552, 78 S.E.2d 410.