![Walsh v. Ikon office Solutions](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Walsh v. Ikon office Solutions](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Walsh v. Ikon office Solutions
148 CAL.APP.4TH 1440, 56 CAL.RPTR.3D 534, 2007 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 4328, 07 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 3228, 2007.CA.0001786
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
Plaintiffs Ryan Walsh (Walsh) and Kevin Miller (Miller), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, appeal from an order decertifying one of several subclasses in their class action against respondent IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (IKON). Appellants contend: (1) the order is erroneous because it fails to identify sufficiently the courts reasons for decertification; and (2) the evidence does not support the trial courts conclusion; and (3) IKONs motion was untimely and procedurally defective in its failure to comply with local rules of the San Francisco Superior Court.