![Dees v. Billy](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Dees v. Billy](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Dees v. Billy
394 F.3d 1290, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 711, 5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 515, C09.0000287(2005)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
FOR PUBLICATION Argued and Submitted December 9, 2004-San Francisco, California OPINION We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to review a district court order that stayed the plaintiff's medical malpractice action, compelled arbitration, and administratively closed the case.