Gerald F. Bachand v. Connecticut General

This case presents a question regarding the relationship between the courts and administrative agencies. Gerald Bachand's
complaint is that he was fired in violation of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act. Throughout, "dual track" proceedings have
occurred, and, throughout, the employer has sought to have the circuit court proceedings dismissed. Because the Wisconsin
Fair Employment Act provides for lost wages to be pursued only through an administrative agency (DILHR), we reverse that part
of the judgment. We also reverse that part of the judgment allowing compensatory and punitive damages for emotional distress. Gerald F. Bachand was employed by Connecticut General Life Insurance Company from March 4, 1968 until July 31, 1973, when
he was terminated. He filed a complaint with DILHR alleging his termination violated provisions of the Wisconsin Fair Employment
Act, secs. 111.31-37, Stats., prohibiting discrimination in employment against handicapped persons. Bachand claimed he was
fired because of his alcoholism. He asserted that his alcoholism was a handicap within the meaning of the act and was the
sole reason for his discharge.