Harry Eakin v. James Kumiega and Vicki Harry Eakin v. James Kumiega and Vicki

Harry Eakin v. James Kumiega and Vicki

1991.IN.30318 ; 567 N.E.2D 150

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

In two cases decided this date, two appellate panels have decided that failure to file an assignment of errors deprives the appellate court of review jurisdiction. Claywell v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dept. of Employment and Training Serv., No. 93-A-1931 93-R-606 (May 31, 1994) 5th Dist. Ind.App., N.E.2d ;[Footnote 1] St. Amand-Zion v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Dept. of Employment and Training Serv., No. 93A02-9210-EX-497 (May 31, 1994) 4th Dist. Ind.App., 635 N.E.2d 184.[Footnote 2] This district disagrees. The jurisdictional predicate relied upon by the other panels is a relic of the past. The requirement has been abolished.[Footnote 3]

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1991
28. Februar
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
6
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
63,6
 kB
James Bond v. State Indiana James Bond v. State Indiana
1980
Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider
1995
Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna
1995
James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness
1987
Parke County v. Ropak Parke County v. Ropak
1988
F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter
1988