People v. Vo People v. Vo

People v. Vo

932 P.2d 849, 1996.CO.40081

    • 0,49 €
    • 0,49 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Opinion by JUDGE RULAND Defendant, Thien Van Vo, appeals the surcharges imposed in connection with a sentence to probation following his guilty plea to second degree sexual assault, a class four felony. Defendant's single argument on appeal is that the imposition of two statutory surcharges violates the prohibition against double jeopardy in Colo. Const. art. II, § 18. We disagree and therefore affirm. The two surcharges imposed and challenged in the present case are authorized by statute. See § 18-21-103(1)(c), C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.)(each person convicted of a class four sex offense shall pay $1,000 which shall be applied to the sex offender surcharge fund); §§ 24-4.2-104(1)(a)(II)(A) & (B), C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.)(in addition to the general surcharge applicable to all felony convictions, each person convicted of second degree sexual assault shall pay a $1,000 surcharge which shall be applied to the victims and witnesses assistance and law enforcement fund).

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1996
12. Dezember
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
2
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
45,3
 kB
People v. Johnson People v. Johnson
1996
Richards v. Winter Park Recreational Association Richards v. Winter Park Recreational Association
1996
Packaging Store Inc. v. Leung Packaging Store Inc. v. Leung
1996
Wiegand v. County Court Magistrate Wiegand v. County Court Magistrate
1996
Horton v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office Horton v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
1996
Quintana v. City of Westminster Quintana v. City of Westminster
2002