State v. Earl State v. Earl

State v. Earl

336 Ark. 271, 984 S.W.2d 442, AR.0043133(1999)

    • 0,49 €
    • 0,49 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Appellee Hezile Earl, Jr., seeks the recall of this court's mandate issued on November 10, 1998, and bases his motion on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Knowles v. Iowa, No. 97-7597 (U.S. Sup.Ct. Dec. 8, 1998). There, the Supreme Court held that a search incident to a traffic violation conducted pursuant to Iowa Code Ann. § 805.1(4) violated the Fourth Amendment. While § 805.1(4) is similar or equivalent to our Ark. R. Crim. P. 5.5, which was in issue in Earl's case here, Earl, unlike the defendant in Knowles, did not challenge Rule 5.5's constitutionality. See State v. Earl, 333 Ark. 489, 970 S.W.2d 789 (1998). 1 In fact, this court emphasized this point, stating the following: We are aware the American Bar Association has recommended that Rule 5.5 and similar rules employed in other [336 Ark Page 272] jurisdictions not be used due to questions pertaining to its constitutional validity. However, Rule 5.5's constitutionality is not before us.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1999
28. Januar
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
6
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
50,9
 kB
White v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation White v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation
1999
Nance v. State Nance v. State
1999
State Police Comm. v. Smith State Police Comm. v. Smith
1999
Mcgehee v. State Mcgehee v. State
1999
Arkansas Dept. of Human Serv. v. Heath Arkansas Dept. of Human Serv. v. Heath
1991
Cole v. State Cole v. State
1991