A Canadian Perspective on the Subjective Component of the Bipartite Test for "Persecution": Time for Re-Evaluation.
Refuge 2004, March, 22, 1
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Abstract Canadian decision makers refer so regularly to the bipartite nature of the test for persecution in refugee claims that one rarely gives the matter a second thought. After all, the Supreme Court of Canada in Ward clearly affirmed that a refugee claimant must subjectively fear persecution, and this fear must be well-founded in an objective sense.
The Guideline on Procedures with Respect to Vulnerable Persons Appearing Before the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada: A Critical Overview (Report)
2008
Canada's Refugee Status Determination System and the International Norm of Independence (Report)
2008
The Many Faces of "Prima Facie": Group-Based Evidence in Refugee Status Determination (Report)
2008
Studies in Law, Politics and Society
2014
Refugee Repatriation
2018
Studies in Law, Politics, and Society
2018
"Disturbing Practices": Dehumanizing Asylum Seekers in the Refugee "Crisis" in Australia, 2001-2002 (Includes Abstract in French)
2003
To Deter and Deny: Australia and the Interdiction of Asylum Seekers.
2003
"Between a Rock and a Hard Place": Australia's Mandatory Detention of Asylum Seekers.
2002
Forced Migrants in Serbia: Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons--Facts and Figures, Coping Strategies, Future (Report)
2009
Responsibility Sharing Or Shifting? "Safe" Third Countries and International Law (Conference Notes)
2008
"I Have a Voice--Hear Me!" Findings of an Australian Study Examining the Resettlement and Integration Experience of Refugees and Migrants from the Horn of Africa in Australia (Report)
2009