Assessing Learning Style Differences Between Honors and Non-Honors Students. Assessing Learning Style Differences Between Honors and Non-Honors Students.

Assessing Learning Style Differences Between Honors and Non-Honors Students‪.‬

Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 2004, Fall-Winter, 5, 2

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

What defines an "honors" student and what key differences, if any, exist between honors and non-honors students? One obvious difference exists in measures of academic achievement; college honors students, by virtue of typical admission criteria, have higher GPA's and standardized test scores (Long & Lange, 2002). Consistent with these higher academic credentials, honors students have often been described as more autonomous, more responsible, and more motivated (Grangaard, 2003; Orban & Chalifoux, 2002; Palmer & Wohl, 1972). Additionally, honors students tend to demonstrate to a greater degree many behaviors that positively correlate with academic performance, such as skipping class less often, preparing longer for class, asking more questions per class, spending more time rewriting papers, spending more time meeting with faculty outside class hours, watching less television, drinking less alcohol, and focusing on course grades (Clark, 2000; Harte, 1994; Long & Lange, 2002; Schuman, 1995). While these comparisons suggest that the high academic credentials of honors students might be partially explained via their study habits, few studies have examined potential cognitive differences between honors and non-honors students. Clark (2000) found that academically talented college students possessed a greater preference for abstract, conceptual, and integrative reflection and tended to score at the intuitive end of the Myers-Briggs personality inventory (indicating more creativity and ability to engage in abstract thought), whereas less talented students tended to be more concrete. Similarly, Shaughnessy and Moore (1994) partially attributed the higher IQ scores of honors students to higher order thinking abilities. This work hints at what honors programs have intuitively asserted for years: honors students think and learn differently, and honors pedagogy should be tailored to meet these students' unique abilities. However, further empirical research is needed to uncover, identify, describe, and define these differences in thinking and learning. The current study will attempt to further elucidate the difference between honors and non-honors students by using the Inventory of Learning Processes (ILP; Schmeck, 1982; Schmeck, Ribich, & Ramanaiah, 1977).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
22 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
10
Pages
PUBLISHER
National Collegiate Honors Council
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
198.1
KB
Student Perspectives on Assessment Student Perspectives on Assessment
2009
Can Unlike Students Learn Together? Can Unlike Students Learn Together?
2006
Style Differences in Cognition, Learning, and Management Style Differences in Cognition, Learning, and Management
2012
Self-Regulation, Goal Orientation, And Academic Achievement of Secondary Students in Online University Courses (Report) Self-Regulation, Goal Orientation, And Academic Achievement of Secondary Students in Online University Courses (Report)
2009
Conversations about Adult Learning in Our Complex World Conversations about Adult Learning in Our Complex World
2012
Differences Between Learning Styles in Professional Courses at University Level (Report) Differences Between Learning Styles in Professional Courses at University Level (Report)
2009
Seeing Nature: Ansel Adams in the Human and Natural Environments of Yosemite (Portz-Prize-Winning Essay, 2004) Seeing Nature: Ansel Adams in the Human and Natural Environments of Yosemite (Portz-Prize-Winning Essay, 2004)
2005
The Prairie Home Companion Honors Program (Forum on "Honors Culture") (Essay) The Prairie Home Companion Honors Program (Forum on "Honors Culture") (Essay)
2008
The Virgin Mary: A Paradoxical Model for Roman Catholic Immigrant Women of the Nineteenth Century (Portz-Price-Winning Essay, 2006) (Essay) The Virgin Mary: A Paradoxical Model for Roman Catholic Immigrant Women of the Nineteenth Century (Portz-Price-Winning Essay, 2006) (Essay)
2007
"the Play's the Thing": Theater Arts and Liberal Learning (Teaching the Creative Arts) "the Play's the Thing": Theater Arts and Liberal Learning (Teaching the Creative Arts)
2001
Elitism Misunderstood: In Defense of Equal Opportunity (Forum on "Social Class and Honors") (Essay) Elitism Misunderstood: In Defense of Equal Opportunity (Forum on "Social Class and Honors") (Essay)
2009
Using Learning Outcomes Assessment in Honors As a Defense Against Proposed Standardized Testing (Forum on "Outcomes Assessment, Accountability, And Honors") Using Learning Outcomes Assessment in Honors As a Defense Against Proposed Standardized Testing (Forum on "Outcomes Assessment, Accountability, And Honors")
2006