Byrne v. Nezhat Byrne v. Nezhat

Byrne v. Nezhat

261 F.3D 1075, 2001.C11.0000552

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Stripped to its essentials, this is a simple medical malpractice case. It was brought, however, as a multi-count RICO prosecution. Suspecting that the claims in the complaint lacked factual bases, the district court took an unusual step and granted the defendants leave to conduct discovery for the purpose of determining whether plaintiffs counsel had violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The discovery was to determine whether plaintiffs counsel had conducted an "inquiry reasonable under the circumstances" into the factual support for the claims presented in the complaint. After the court took this step, the plaintiff moved the court to recuse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455. The court denied the motion.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2001
14 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
130
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
115.2
KB

More Books by Arizona Supreme Court

State v. Spillman State v. Spillman
1970
Young Candy & Tobacco Co. V. Montoya Young Candy & Tobacco Co. V. Montoya
1962
Swanson v. Image Bank Swanson v. Image Bank
2003
Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole
1995
Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp. Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.
1995
Sohl v. Winkler Sohl v. Winkler
1994