Comments on "A Higher and Better Definition" (Letters to the Editor) (Letter to the Editor)
Appraisal Journal 2004, Spring, 72, 2
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
I found the article "A Higher and Better Definition" (Winter 2004) interesting and thought provoking, but I also found myself questioning some of the points made and conclusions reached. I have been working with the current definition of highest and best use for more years than I can remember and have not found the definition to be either ambiguous or redundant. The identity of the conjunction "and" instead of "or" as a problem in the definition appears to me to be a misplaced concern requiring a rather narrow interpretation of the sentence.
The Accounting Postulates and Principles Controversy of the 1960s
2020
A Journey into Accounting Thought
2001
Inquiry and Decision (Routledge Revivals)
2014
Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
2012
SUPPLEMENT I: Quantum Decision making and Problem Solving
2011
The Nature of Accounting Regulation
2013
Cross-Examination at a Jury Trial. (Features).
2003
Where the Overall Cap Rate Meets the Discount Rate (Property Valuation)
2004
Discount Rates for Consistent Valuation of Various Measures of Book Income and Cash Flow (Features)
2003
Subdivision Development: Risk, Profit, And Developer Surveys.
2004
What's a Warranty Worth? the Impact of Home Owner Warranties on Property Sales.
2004
A Practical Tool to Assist in Analyzing Risk Associated with Income Capitalization Approach Valuation Or Investment Analysis (Features; Excel Model)
2003