![Donald Blare v. Husky Injection Molding](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Donald Blare v. Husky Injection Molding](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Donald Blare v. Husky Injection Molding
MA.1516 , 646 N.E.2d 111, 437 (1995)(419 Mass)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Practice, Civil, Summary judgment. Anti-Discrimination Law, Termination of employment, Age, Prima facie case, Burden of proof. Employment, Discrimination, Termination. ABRAMS, J. At issue is whether the Superior Court Judge applied the appropriate standard in allowing the defendants' motions for summary judgment in a case alleging age discrimination under G. L. c. 151B (1992 ed.), and G. L. c. 93, § 103 (1992 ed.). 2 For the reasons stated in this opinion, we conclude that the defendants' notions for summary judgment should not have been allowed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.