Epistemology of Experimental Gravity: Scientific Rationality Epistemology of Experimental Gravity: Scientific Rationality

Epistemology of Experimental Gravity: Scientific Rationality

Publisher Description

The evolution of gravitational tests from an epistemological perspective framed in the concept of rational reconstruction of Imre Lakatos, based on his methodology of research programmes. Unlike other works on the same subject, the evaluated period is very extensive, starting with Newton's natural philosophy and up to the quantum gravity theories of today. In order to explain in a more rational way the complex evolution of the gravity concept of the last century, I propose a natural extension of the methodology of the research programmes of Lakatos that I then use during the paper. I believe that this approach offers a new perspective on how evolved over time the concept of gravity and the methods of testing each theory of gravity, through observations and experiments. I argue, based on the methodology of the research programmes and the studies of scientists and philosophers, that the current theories of quantum gravity are degenerative, due to the lack of experimental evidence over a long period of time and of self-immunization against the possibility of falsification. Moreover, a methodological current is being developed that assigns a secondary, unimportant role to verification through observations and/or experiments. For this reason, it will not be possible to have a complete theory of quantum gravity in its current form, which to include to the limit the general relativity, since physical theories have always been adjusted, during their evolution, based on observational or experimental tests, and verified by the predictions made. Also, contrary to a widespread opinion and current active programs regarding the unification of all the fundamental forces of physics in a single final theory, based on string theory, I argue that this unification is generally unlikely, and it is not possible anyway for a unification to be developed based on current theories of quantum gravity, including string theory. In addition, I support the views of some scientists and philosophers that currently too much resources are being consumed on the idea of developing quantum gravity theories, and in particular string theory, to include general relativity and to unify gravity with other forces, as long as science does not impose such research programs.

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35350.70724

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2019
7 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
331
Pages
PUBLISHER
Nicolae Sfetcu
SELLER
Draft2Digital, LLC
SIZE
338.2
KB
The Universe of General Relativity The Universe of General Relativity
2006
Thinking About Space and Time Thinking About Space and Time
2020
What Gravity is. Some Recent Considerations. What Gravity is. Some Recent Considerations.
2008
The Renaissance of General Relativity in Context The Renaissance of General Relativity in Context
2020
The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics
2021
The Singularities as Ontological Limits of the General Relativity The Singularities as Ontological Limits of the General Relativity
2019
Plato, The Republic: On Justice – Dialectics and Education Plato, The Republic: On Justice – Dialectics and Education
2022
Reptiles Reptiles
2011
Bridge Bidding: Standard American Yellow Card Bridge Bidding: Standard American Yellow Card
2014
Philosophy of Blockchain Technology: Ontologies Philosophy of Blockchain Technology: Ontologies
2019
Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card
2014
Web Design & Development Web Design & Development
2011