F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

729 A.2D 1278, 1999.PA.43513 , 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2554

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The Fraternal Order of Police, Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 (FOP) petitions for review of the June 6, 1998 Final Order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) that dismissed a charge of unfair labor practice against the City of Sharon (City) after determining that the Citys unilateral reduction of a service requirement for promotion eligibility did not affect a mandatory subject of collective bargaining. The FOP contends that the Board erred by holding that a reduction in seniority requirements for a bargaining unit promotional opportunity in a Third Class City police department was not a mandatory subject of bargaining under the Act of June 24, 1968, P.L. 237, as amended, 43 P.S. 217.1—217.10, more commonly known as Act 111. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1999
18 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
77.4
KB

More Books by Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Giant Food Stores, LLC v. Department of Health Giant Food Stores, LLC v. Department of Health
2002
Gross v. City of Pittsburgh Gross v. City of Pittsburgh
1999
Main Line Health, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund Main Line Health, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund
1999
Robert E. Faust Agency, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Insurance Department Robert E. Faust Agency, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Insurance Department
1999
Mulligan v. Piczon Mulligan v. Piczon
1999
White v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation White v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
1999