![Fashion Place Investment v. Salt Lake](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Fashion Place Investment v. Salt Lake](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Fashion Place Investment v. Salt Lake
1989.UT.164, 776 P.2D 941, 111 UTAH ADV. REP. 73
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
This appeal involves a dispute between Salt Lake County Mental Health (Salt Lake County), as tenant, and Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco), as the landlords insurer, in a subrogation claim for damages resulting from a fire that destroyed the leased premises. The trial court found that Salt Lake County was an implied coinsured under the terms of the lease thereby barring subrogation by Safeco. Safeco, in the name of the landlord, Fashion Place Investors (Fashion Place), appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of Salt Lake County. We affirm.