Fashion Place Investment v. Salt Lake Fashion Place Investment v. Salt Lake

Fashion Place Investment v. Salt Lake

1989.UT.164, 776 P.2D 941, 111 UTAH ADV. REP. 73

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This appeal involves a dispute between Salt Lake County Mental Health (Salt Lake County), as tenant, and Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco), as the landlords insurer, in a subrogation claim for damages resulting from a fire that destroyed the leased premises. The trial court found that Salt Lake County was an implied coinsured under the terms of the lease thereby barring subrogation by Safeco. Safeco, in the name of the landlord, Fashion Place Investors (Fashion Place), appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of Salt Lake County. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
26 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
61.7
KB

More Books by Division Three Court of Appeals of Washington

Woodcraft Construction Inc. v. Hamilton Woodcraft Construction Inc. v. Hamilton
1990
Pybus Steel Co. v. Department of Labor and Industries Pybus Steel Co. v. Department of Labor and Industries
1975
[U] Washington v. Amo [U] Washington v. Amo
1994
Washington v. Sanchez Washington v. Sanchez
1994
Washington v. Reese Washington v. Reese
1974
In Re Estate Of Frank J. Pfleghar. Edna Charlotte Pfleghar In Re Estate Of Frank J. Pfleghar. Edna Charlotte Pfleghar
1983