Federal Pacific Electric Company v. Rao Electric Equipment Co. Federal Pacific Electric Company v. Rao Electric Equipment Co.

Federal Pacific Electric Company v. Rao Electric Equipment Co‪.‬

NY.48638; 221 N.Y.S.2d 745; 15 A.D.2d 456 (1961)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Order and judgment granting plaintiff summary judgment, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in this action for goods sold and delivered, unanimously modified, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff an absolute order of preclusion and judgment on the pleadings, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. This was not a proper motion on which to grant summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or to grant judgment on the merits. However, under the alternative relief requested by plaintiff in its notice of motion, Special Term could have granted the relief which this court now grants, the record indisputably establishing plaintiff's right to such relief in the exercise of discretion and as a matter of law. Rule 113 searches the evidentiary facts in the case to determine the existence or absence of an issue of fact. Hence, the requirement, generally, for a party's affidavit, and the inadequacy of plaintiff's proof in this respect. In this case, however, plaintiff established that defendant should be totally precluded on its counterclaim. Consequently, upon such preclusion, plaintiff was entitled to judgment on the pleadings, the order of preclusion serving to limit defendant's pleading, leaving only admissions of the cause of action in chief. Since it would serve no useful purpose to remit the parties to proceedings the outcome of which would be, on this record, inescapable, this court does what Special Term could have done in the first instance (Civ. Prac. Act, § 584; 9 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, pp. 183-186; cf. De Rosa v. Slattery Contr. Co., 14 A.D.2d 278). Settle order on notice. Disposition Order and judgment granting plaintiff summary judgment, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in this action for goods sold and delivered, unanimously modified, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff an absolute order of preclusion and judgment on the pleadings, with costs to plaintiff-respondent.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1961
7 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
71.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of New York

People State New York v. John H. Cunningham People State New York v. John H. Cunningham
1986
Canstar Canstar
1995
Matter Hope Foster v. Joseph D'Elia Matter Hope Foster v. Joseph D'Elia
1979
Matter Estate Zoe E. Pierce Matter Estate Zoe E. Pierce
1984
John Odonnell v. Westchester Community Service Council John Odonnell v. Westchester Community Service Council
1983
New York Business Development Corporation v. Gilbert's Hotel New York Business Development Corporation v. Gilbert's Hotel
1966