![Federal Question Jurisdiction and Justice Holmes.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Federal Question Jurisdiction and Justice Holmes.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Federal Question Jurisdiction and Justice Holmes.
Notre Dame Law Review 2009, July, 84, 5
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
INTRODUCTION A recurring issue in the study of federal courts is what cases arise under federal law for purposes of [section] 1331. (1) The general rule is clear enough. The federal issue must arise on the face of the plaintiff's well-pleaded complaint. There are two categories of such cases. One consists in causes of action created by the Constitution or federal law, such as rights of action under the antitrust laws. Another category comprises state causes of action with substantial and contested federal ingredients. The late Paul Bator referred to these categories respectively as "Proposition A" and "Proposition B" cases, terminology that was incorporated into the third edition of Hart & Wechsler's federal courts text. (2)
More Books by Notre Dame Law Review
Adolescent Brain Science After Graham V. Florida.
2011
The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice.
2009
Collateral Censorship and the Limits of Intermediary Immunity.
2011
Scary Monsters: Hybrids, Mashups, And Other Illegitimate Children (Creativity and the Law)
2011
A Note on Incentives, Rights, And the Public Domain in Copyright Law. (Symposium: Creativity and the Law)
2011
Atypical Inventions (Creativity and the Law)
2011