In Re S.E.W. In Re S.E.W.

In Re S.E.W‪.‬

168 S.W.3D 875, 2005.TX.0003494

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

In this termination of parental rights case, the primary issues are whether an expert witness was qualified to give an opinion as to the results of drug testing of hair samples and whether the opinion was reliable where the expert did not conduct the test or know which of several available tests the laboratory used. Although we conclude the evidence is legally sufficient to support the judgment, we conclude the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the experts opinion and the error probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment. We reverse the trial courts judgment and remand for further proceedings. After two referrals and an investigation, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services removed S.E.W. and S.A.W. from Debbie Marien (Mother) and Stefan Geller (Father) and later sought to terminate their parental rights to the children. Based on the jurys findings that the parents endangered the physical or emotional well-being of the children and that termination was in the childrens best interest, the trial court terminated the parental rights of Mother and Father to their son, S.E.W., and daughter, S.A.W.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
19 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
19
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
57.5
KB
Sanders v. Herold Sanders v. Herold
2006
Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Meb Engineering Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Meb Engineering
2004
Taylor v. State Taylor v. State
2003
Urena v. Western Investments Urena v. Western Investments
2003
Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co. Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co.
2007
Garza v. Hibernia National Bank Garza v. Hibernia National Bank
2007