L.S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. Ipalco Et Al. L.S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. Ipalco Et Al.

L.S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. Ipalco Et Al‪.‬

1976.IN.30291; 351 N.E.2D 814; 169 IND. APP. 652

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Commission to increase its electric rates. A new rate increase would affect 270,454 ratepayers in Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Morgan, Owen, Putnam, and Shelby Counties.[Footnote 1] The old rates had been in effect since August 1, 1938. In its petition to increase electric rates, the Petitioner, Indianapolis Power & Light Company, stressed the narrowing margin over past years between its operating revenues and operating expenses. This narrowing margin had resulted in a denial of a fair return to the Petitioner upon the fair value of its utility properties. The new rates proposed by the Petitioner would increase operating revenues approximately $14,700,000.00 and would increase income approximately $6,800,000.00 per year.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1976
12 July
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
73
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
93.9
KB

More Books by First District Court of Appeals of Indiana

Gregory Sargent v. State Indiana Gregory Sargent v. State Indiana
1973
Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider
1995
Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna
1995
James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness
1987
Parke County v. Ropak Parke County v. Ropak
1988
F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter
1988