Love Canal
A Toxic History from Colonial Times to the Present
-
- $39.99
-
- $39.99
Publisher Description
In the summer of 1978, residents of Love Canal, a suburban development in Niagara Falls, NY, began protesting against the leaking toxic waste dump in their midst-a sixteen-acre site containing 100,000 barrels of chemical waste that anchored their neighborhood. Initially seeking evacuation, area activists soon found that they were engaged in a far larger battle over the meaning of America's industrial past and its environmental future. The Love Canal protest movement inaugurated the era of grassroots environmentalism, spawning new anti-toxics laws and new models of ecological protest.
Historian Richard S. Newman examines the Love Canal crisis through the area's broader landscape, detailing the way this ever-contentious region has been used, altered, and understood from the colonial era to the present day. Newman journeys into colonial land use battles between Native Americans and European settlers, 19th-century utopian city planning, the rise of the American chemical industry in the 20th century, the transformation of environmental activism in the 1970s, and the memory of environmental disasters in our own time.
In an era of hydrofracking and renewed concern about nuclear waste disposal, Love Canal remains relevant. It is only by starting at the very beginning of the site's environmental history that we can understand the road to a hazardous waste crisis in the 1970s-and to the global environmental justice movement it sparked.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Newman (Freedom's Prophet), a historian and environmentalist, diligently digs into how and why Love Canal became "perhaps the world's most famous toxic trash heap." Located near Niagara Falls, N.Y., the area now resembles an ordinary patch of suburbia, but more than 20,000 tons of industrial waste lies buried underneath dumped there in the 1940s and '50s by Hooker Chemical when its on-site disposal facility got overwhelmed. In the 1970s and early '80s, homeowners in a subdivision that had sprouted up around the canal zone complained of "odd odors and various health concerns" including "chemical burns their children suffered after playing on fields covering the dump" and worried about waste seeping into their basements. This wasn't simply "a technical problem about hazardous waste containment," Newman notes. "Love Canal was for them a chemical disaster." He charts the work done by citizen-activist groups, such as the Love Canal Homeowners Association, to put pressure on government and health officials, and traces the rise of local grassroots activism. Along the way, Newman addresses issues of environmental racism and deindustrialization. He recognizes the influence of the dedicated and vocal women of Love Canal who "picketed, protested, and petitioned" to make their concerns known, and highlights continuing efforts to achieve environmental justice in the region. Illus.
