Nullification, Secession, Webster’s Argument, and the Kentucky and Virginia…
Considered in Reference to the Constitution and Historically
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Robert E. Lee called secession “nothing but revolution”—yet decades later, writers still claimed the Constitution gave each state the right to leave. Caleb William Loring opens by asking what Daniel Webster’s famous clash with Robert Hayne really established.
Writing in the late nineteenth century, Loring revisits the fierce Senate debate of January 1830, when South Carolina threatened to nullify federal tariff laws. Webster faced Hayne’s defense of state sovereignty, and the argument reaches beyond one speech: was the Union a national government, or merely a compact its members could abandon? Loring challenges claims that Webster’s account was historically mistaken, insisting that the Constitution’s origins matter as much as the outcome of war. If the states could nullify a law, where would that principle lead—and could the Union hold?
With centuries of literature, it's inevitable that some will fall through the cracks. We hunt down public domain works and restore them so they're not lost to the world.
Who are we? We're Cairn Press. Our background is in design, publishing, typography, and technology. These skills fuel our mission to create the highest quality Public Domain eBooks available online, at an affordable price. We give them the treatment they deserve; our proprietary process restores books for a better overall user experience in design, readability, and e-reader compatibility.