Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside) Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside)

Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside‪)‬

Insurance Advocate 2010, Feb 8, 121, 3

Lawrence N. Rogak
    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Immediate Imaging PC and Global Liberty Insurance Company, AAA Case No. 412009041330, AAA Assessment No. 17 991 21272 09 (Insurer's Claim File No. 083889) (Aaron D. Maslow, Esq., arbitrator) The Applicant commenced this No-Fault arbitration, seeking as compensation $912.00, which it billed for performing a lumbar spine MRI on July 16, 2008, on Assignor, a 42-year old male, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on Feb. 3, 2008. Respondent Insurer denied payment, invoking the 30-day rule for providing written notice of claim.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2010
8 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
CINN Group, Inc.
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
65.9
KB

More Books by Lawrence N. Rogak

Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside) Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)
Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)
2010
Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside) Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)
Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)
2010
Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath) Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)
Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)
2010
Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside) Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)
Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)
2010
Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside) Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)
Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)
2010
Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside) Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)
Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)
2010