Paramount Paper Products Company v. Aetna Paramount Paper Products Company v. Aetna

Paramount Paper Products Company v. Aetna

NE.67 , 157 N.W.2d 763, 828 (1968)(182 Neb)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This is an action on a blanket crime policy issued by defendant to plaintiff. As a part of the insuring agreement, the policy
provides coverage as follows: "EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY COVERAGE. 1. Loss of Money, Securities and other property which the Insured
shall sustain through any fraudulent or dishonest act or acts committed by any of the Employees, acting alone or in collusion
with others." It also contains the following exclusion clause referred to as Section 2. "This Policy does not apply: * * *
(b) to loss, or to that part of any loss, as the case may be, the proof of which, either as to its factual existence or as
to its amount, is dependent upon an inventory computation or a profit and loss computation; provided, however, that this paragraph
shall not apply to loss of Money, Securities or other property which the Insured can prove, through evidence wholly apart
from such computations, is sustained by the Insured through any fraudulent or dishonest act or acts committed by any one or
more of the Employees; * * *." At the Conclusion of plaintiff's evidence, the trial court sustained defendant's motion to dismiss and plaintiff appeals.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1968
29 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
15
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
69.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Nebraska

Elaine Delay v. Homer Brainard Elaine Delay v. Homer Brainard
1968
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
1980
Berniece O. Stratton v. Chevrolet Motor Berniece O. Stratton v. Chevrolet Motor
1988
Rosemary Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese Rosemary Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese
1993
City of Gordon v. Montana Feeders City of Gordon v. Montana Feeders
2007
State Nebraska v. Arthur Lyle State Nebraska v. Arthur Lyle
1994