Paula Barney v. Donald Suggs
1985.MO.405, 688 S.W.2D 356
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Consolidated appeals by defendant-dentist seeking relief from a $300,000 default judgment in favor of plaintiff-patient. The court of appeals concluded under Vonsmith v. Vonsmith, 666 S.W.2d 424 (Mo. banc 1984), after retransfer, 666 S.W.2d 426 (Mo.App. 1984), it had no jurisdiction over defendants direct appeal because of the absence of a timely motion to vacate the judgment. However, the court of appeals considered defendants multi-pronged motions, filed subsequent to his notice of appeal, as a motion to set aside for irregularity under Rule 74.32 and opined that the lack of substantial evidence to support the damage award was an irregularity entitling defendant to a new trial on the issue of damages. Because of the importance and general interest of the issues involved, the cause was transferred to this Court. We affirm.