Preface. Preface.

Preface‪.‬

The Hastings Center Report 2005, Nov-Dec, 35, 6

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

At the time of the Karen Ann Quinlan case in 1975, the law and ethics of forgoing life-sustaining treatment were terra incognita. By 1990, the Nancy Beth Cruzan case, the federal Patient Self-Determination Act, and court rulings and statutes in all fifty states had created a widely accepted framework for decision-making near the end of life. Establishing this framework is one of the great accomplishments in bioethics. Or so goes one common story. Expanded a little, the story goes like this: Thirty years ago, awareness began to grow that the experience of dying (for the individual, for the family, and often for health caregivers) was often a horror. Sentiment began to grow behind a movement to improve end of life care, and this reform movement was based on the belief that the horror of death was avoidable because it does not reside in dying or death per se, but in a poorly managed dying. What needed to be done, the reformers saw, was to look death in the face and wrest control over dying from doctors and hospitals, with their powerful but mindless drugs and machines--virtual loose cannons that could be as burdensome for some as they were beneficial to others. If lack of control, the technological imperative, and unrelieved pain and suffering are what make dying fearful, then the key to improving end of life care is twofold: First, we should enlist the law to empower persons to dictate the terms of their own medical care at the end of life (via constitutional rights and legally authorized advance directives). Second, we should enlist medicine to improve its skill at treating pain and suffering (financing for hospice and professional education in palliative care). If we could do these two things (the reformers hoped and believed), ordinary people and their families--the intended beneficiaries of all this work would embrace the reforms with open arms, insist on making their own medical decisions at life's end, and complete advance directives. By 1990, although work remained to be done to bring this agenda to fruition, the agenda itself, at least, was settled.

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2005
1 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
Hastings Center
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
134.8
KB

More Books Like This

Physician-Assisted Death in the United States: Are the Existing "Last Resorts" Enough?(Essays) Physician-Assisted Death in the United States: Are the Existing "Last Resorts" Enough?(Essays)
2008
Death: "the Distinguished Thing". Death: "the Distinguished Thing".
2005
Conflict and Consensus at the End of Life. Conflict and Consensus at the End of Life.
2005
Ethical Diversity in Healthcare Delivery Ethical Diversity in Healthcare Delivery
2017
Intellectually Impaired People Intellectually Impaired People
2023
Culture/Place/Health Culture/Place/Health
2005

More Books by The Hastings Center Report

"Clean" Nuclear Energy? Global Warming, Public Health, And Justice (Policy & Politics) "Clean" Nuclear Energy? Global Warming, Public Health, And Justice (Policy & Politics)
2008
Facing up to Paternalism in Research Ethics. Facing up to Paternalism in Research Ethics.
2007
"Nanoethics"? What's New? "Nanoethics"? What's New?
2007
Culture Clash Involving Intersex (Case Study) Culture Clash Involving Intersex (Case Study)
2003
Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President's Council on Bioethics. (Essay). Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President's Council on Bioethics. (Essay).
2003
Tipping Point, Over the Top, Or Just Noncompliance As Usual?(Essays) Tipping Point, Over the Top, Or Just Noncompliance As Usual?(Essays)
2008