Richard Dawkins The God Delusion: A Theist Response Richard Dawkins The God Delusion: A Theist Response

Richard Dawkins The God Delusion: A Theist Response

    • 2.0 • 24 Ratings

Publisher Description

In this interesting piece; the author argues that Richard Dawkins has failed in his attempts to put a good rational argument for atheism.
The professor uses the rather feeble approach of setting up straw men only to dismantle them with great relish. These repeated mischaracterizations of faith do the atheist camp no favours. All it does is betray a vitriolic personal agenda.

It is argued that The God delusion has helped to perpetuate two major modern myths. First that religion and science contradict each other and second that Theists are unthinking drones. If Aristotle, Augustine, Plotinus, Aquinas, Descartes, Kant, Einstein, Collins and thousands of other genius's are unthinking drones -this would make Richard Dawkins intelligence amoeba like.

A rational case for Theism is proposed.

GENRE
Non-Fiction
RELEASED
2012
17 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
Ian McCoy
SELLER
Draft2Digital, LLC
SIZE
57.3
KB

Customer Reviews

Mal44 ,

Pitiful, not worth downloading

The author makes no real effort to further his own cause. In this 'book' he uses the tired argument that without god we could not exist therefore that is proof that god exists. The author also claims to be a reformed atheist and tries to use his reformation as proof of god, i.e. I didn't believe in god but now I do, therefore god must exist.

PeterPFC ,

Richard Dawkin's God Delusion: Theist Response

Overvalued at the price. The author criticises Dawkins for setting up straw men and demonishing them, and mischaracterising opponents arguments, however, this characterises the "Theist Response". Dawkins, as an individual, and his ideas, merit critical evaluation and merit a thorough critique. One will have to look elsewhere to find that critique.

Benny norton ,

Hollow

Waste of time reading, its no different to what any other theist tries to say to use as evidence for the existence of a deity. His responses don't deserve your time of day. The over-confidence he has in himself to think he would only need 15 pages to give any conceivable argument to Richard Dawkins is nothing short of amusing.

More Books Like This

The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener
1999
The Magic of Consciousness The Magic of Consciousness
2012
The God Game The God Game
2016
Atheism For Dummies Atheism For Dummies
2013
Quantum Faith Quantum Faith
2014
Is God Dead? Is God Dead?
2011

More Books by Ian McCoy

In Mind: Lessons in Mind Reading and Mentalism In Mind: Lessons in Mind Reading and Mentalism
2012
How to be a Mentalist How to be a Mentalist
2012
Memory: Awakening the Giant Within Memory: Awakening the Giant Within
2012
How to be a Mentalist II How to be a Mentalist II
2014
How to be a Mentalist III: Professional Mentalism with Playing Cards How to be a Mentalist III: Professional Mentalism with Playing Cards
2015
How to be a Mentalist IV: Professional Impromptu Mind Reading How to be a Mentalist IV: Professional Impromptu Mind Reading
2015

Customers Also Bought

An Atheist Afterlife An Atheist Afterlife
2012
Thoughts on Buddhism Thoughts on Buddhism
2011
The Ethical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell The Ethical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell
2011
Understanding Kant: Concepts and Intuitions Understanding Kant: Concepts and Intuitions
2011
Philosophy for the Masses: Religion Philosophy for the Masses: Religion
2013
Meaning: the History of Western Philosophy Meaning: the History of Western Philosophy
2014