The Capitalist Manifesto
'An excellent explanation of why capitalism is not just successful, but morally right' ELON MUSK
-
-
4.5 • 2 Ratings
-
-
- $9.99
Publisher Description
'This book is an excellent explanation of why capitalism is not just successful, but morally right' Elon Musk
'A joyful counterblast... packed with vivid examples... decisive' The Economist
'Compelling... Masterful' Daily Mail
'A timely reminder of the benefits of free and open trade' Financial Times
A vital exploration of capitalism and the benefits it brings to global society.
Marx and Engels were right when they observed in The Communist Manifesto that free markets had in a short time created greater prosperity and more technological innovation than all previous generations combined. A century and a half later, all the evidence shows that capitalism has lifted millions from hunger and poverty.
Nonetheless, today's story about global capitalism, shared by right-wing and left-wing populists - and by large sections of the political and economic establishment - accepts that prosperity has been created, but says it ended up in far too few hands. This in turn has made it popular to talk about the global economy as a geopolitical zero-sum game, where we must fight to control new innovations, introduce trade barriers and renationalize supply chains. More generally, capitalism is also accused of fuelling glaring inequality, populist revolts, climate change and China's global conquest.
In this incisive and passionate investigation, Johan Norberg instead restates the case for capitalism and the vital role played by the free market in today's uncertain world. Ultimately, he argues that a move away from global capitalism would not only squeeze the growth out of the economy but also deepen an already large social exclusion for the vulnerable - for the world's poor, it would be a killing blow.
Customer Reviews
Thought provoking and well argued
Very well argued defence of Capitalism. However, we all know that Capitalism has lifted billions out of poverty (nobody wants to live in China in the Mao era), But still, something nags - namely that we’ve heard it all before through the 90s. Is the market the solution for everything? Do we really need privatised infrastructure? How to cause people to build things of beauty which cost more, rather than
achieve the result at the least cost? Nearly every social endeavour is, in effect, a market intervention. The Author seems to suggest that interfering with the market is a mistake, but even anti monopoly regulations interfere with the market. The real question is how and where to interfere. Can we have beautiful architecture instead of strip malls? How about free art installations etc.etc. Is it always the right thing to let the market fulfill needs with the lowest cost solution? The arguments in this book are persuasive but unsatisfying. There is more to it. We haven’t yet really scratched the surface of what is the ideal economic system.