![The Devil Wins](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![The Devil Wins](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
The Devil Wins
A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment
-
- $30.99
-
- $30.99
Publisher Description
A bold retelling of the history of lying in medieval and early modern Europe
Is it ever acceptable to lie? This question plays a surprisingly important role in the story of Europe's transition from medieval to modern society. According to many historians, Europe became modern when Europeans began to lie—that is, when they began to argue that it is sometimes acceptable to lie. This popular account offers a clear trajectory of historical progression from a medieval world of faith, in which every lie is sinful, to a more worldly early modern society in which lying becomes a permissible strategy for self-defense and self-advancement. Unfortunately, this story is wrong.
For medieval and early modern Christians, the problem of the lie was the problem of human existence itself. To ask "Is it ever acceptable to lie?" was to ask how we, as sinners, should live in a fallen world. As it turns out, the answer to that question depended on who did the asking. The Devil Wins uncovers the complicated history of lying from the early days of the Catholic Church to the Enlightenment, revealing the diversity of attitudes about lying by considering the question from the perspectives of five representative voices—the Devil, God, theologians, courtiers, and women. Examining works by Augustine, Bonaventure, Martin Luther, Madeleine de Scudéry, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and a host of others, Dallas G. Denery II shows how the lie, long thought to be the source of worldly corruption, eventually became the very basis of social cohesion and peace.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Denery (Seeing and Being Seen in the Later Medieval World), an associate professor of history at Bowdoin College, takes a thoughtful, if academic, stroll through the complicated and pervasive art of lying: "With one notable exception, it is not a history of specific lies, of who said what to whom, but a history of responses to a very fundamental, if straightforward, question: Is it ever acceptable to lie?" He looks back at a number of historical, theological, and philosophical arguments to trace the evolution of responses and cultural shifts. Denery studies the attempts to interpret the Devil's actions in the Garden of Eden, the debate over whether God can lie, and finally, when it's acceptable for mere mortals to bend the truth. "This is a book about the problem of lying as it appeared to people from the fourth until the eighteenth centuries," he notes, as well as "how the problem of lying became our problem." Though it's a fascinating topic, this is a deep piece written for scholars and academics: complicated, dense, and slow. It has much to offer those who can penetrate Denery's style, as he writes from a true expert's position, but casual readers may have issues.