The Good Story
Exchanges on Truth, Fiction and Psychotherapy
-
- $18.99
-
- $18.99
Publisher Description
The Good Story is an exchange between a writer with a longstanding interest in moral psychology and a psychotherapist with a training in literary studies. J. M. Coetzee and Arabella Kurtz consider psychotherapy and its wider social context from different perspectives, but at the heart of both their approaches is a concern with stories.
Working alone, the writer is in sole charge of the story he or she tells. The therapist, on the other hand, collaborates with the patient in telling the story of their life. What kind of truth do the stories created by patient and therapist aim to uncover: objective truth or the shifting and subjective truth of memories explored and re-experienced in the safety of the therapeutic relationship?
Drawing on great writers like Cervantes and Dostoevsky and on psychoanalysts like Freud and Melanie Klein, the authors offer illuminating insights into the stories we tell of our lives.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
In a series of conversations, recorded between 2011 and 2014, that vary from lively and engaging to staid and tiresome, author Coetzee and his friend, psychotherapist Kurtz, discuss the nature of fiction and truth. Their overriding concerns include storytelling's power to shape the struggle between individual and society, and people's resistance to telling their own stories without inhibition. In an early conversation, Coetzee asks whether, in telling his life's story, he should shape the narrative to heighten drama, or instead stick to objective facts. Kurtz responds that she cannot abide by this opposition between truth and practicality, but that individuals should be content with a version of the truth that works for them. Coetzee wonders repeatedly whether a person's past can ever be truly buried; Kurtz doesn't believe it can. Responding to Coetzee's fascination with how groups shape individuals, Kurtz asserts that "early family experiences" ultimately determine one's "power for creativity or destructiveness." Eventually, though only after Coetzee's overbearing voice becomes wearisome, he concludes that the difference between them is that Kurtz wants to help her patients become happier through greater self-awareness, whereas he doubts such understanding is possible. Reading these rambling conversations is like stumbling onto a private conversation between two people overly absorbed in their personal intellectual games.
