The Market for Luca Pacioli's Summa De Arithmetica: Some Comments (Critical Essay)
Accounting Historians Journal 2010, Dec, 37, 2
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Abstract: This paper explains why Pacioli's exposition of double-entry bookkeeping, published in his Summa of 1494, was neither an effective reference text for merchants nor a satisfactory text for their sons. In doing so, the paper contradicts some of the points made in the interesting and wide-ranging article by Sangster, Stoner, and McCarthy in the June 2008 issue of this journal. INTRODUCTION
More Books Like This
In Defense of Pacioli.
2011
Two-Currency, Nostro and Vostro Acoounts: Historical Notes, 1400-1800.
2011
Abstractions of Evidence in the Study of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books
2016
A Guide to Early Printed Books and Manuscripts
2013
The History of the Book in the West: 400AD–1455
2017
The History of the Book in the West: 1455–1700
2017
More Books by Accounting Historians Journal
An Accounting History of Capital Maintenance: Legal Precedents for Managerial Autonomy in the United Kingdom.
2005
In Defense of Pacioli.
2011
The Market for Luca Pacioli's Summa Arithmetica (Report)
2008
The Printing of Pacioli's Summa in 1494: How Many Copies Were Printed?(Luca Pacioli's Summa De Arithmetica, Geometria, Proportioni Et Proportionalita)
2007
Corporatism and Unavoidable Imperatives: Recommendations on Accounting Principles and the ICAEW Memorandum to the Cohen Committee (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales )
2004
The Impact of World War II on Cost Accounting at the Sperry Corporation.
2003