U.S. v. Cottman U.S. v. Cottman

U.S. v. Cottman

142 F.3d 160, 1998.C03.75

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Amended Opinion Filed 4/21/98 OPINION OF THE COURT Stanley Cottman pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess, sell, and dispose of stolen property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. He was sentenced to 10 months in prison, a three year term of supervised release, and restitution in the amount of $32,420, payable to the FBI. He has appealed two aspects of the sentence imposed by the district court. First, he claims that the district court incorrectly applied a four point upward adjustment under Sentencing Guideline § 2B1.1(b)(4)(B) on the basis that he was ""in the business of"" receiving and selling stolen cable equipment. Second, he contends that the district court had no authority to order him to pay restitution to the FBI for funds it spent as part of an undercover sting operation to acquire the stolen cable equipment from him. Wefind no error in the sentence enhancement under § 2B1.1(b)(4)(B) and we will affirm that portion of the sentence. However, because we conclude that the FBI was not a victim of Cottman's offense, we will vacate that portion of the judgment of sentence, imposing restitution, and we will remand this case for resentencing. I. Factual Background and Procedural History Pursuant to an ongoing investigation of cable television piracy, the FBI established an undercover warehouse operation in Kenilworth, New Jersey. Agents equipped the premises with video and audio recording devices. An undercover FBI agent (the UCA) was the principal operator of the warehouse. Transcripts and videotapes of conversations, as well as other evidence developed as part of the sting, revealed the following events:2

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1998
21 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
37
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
64.5
KB

More Books by Third Circuit U.S. Court Of Appeals

Imo Industries Imo Industries
1998
Anjelino v. New York Times Company Anjelino v. New York Times Company
1999
Borough of Columbia v. Surface Transportation Board Borough of Columbia v. Surface Transportation Board
2003
United States v. Chandler United States v. Chandler
2003
In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation
2002
Pitt News v. Fisher Pitt News v. Fisher
2000