United States v. Bagguley

Per Curiam: David Frank Bagguley appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his motion for correction of his sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim P. 35 and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Bagguley , No. CR-85-64-C (W.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.