Acculog v. Keith Peterson Acculog v. Keith Peterson

Acculog v. Keith Peterson

1984.UT.112, 692 P.2D 728

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

HOWE, Justice: Plaintiffs Acculog appeal from a judgment of "no cause of action" which was entered after a jury returned a special verdict. Acculogs 1977 four-wheel-drive Ford E250 Quadravan, estimated at a value of $7,000, caught fire and was destroyed later in the same day that defendant Peterson Ford had installed a new fuel filter to correct overheating in the engine. Also destroyed in the fire was Acculogs geological equipment consisting of a Mount Sopris bore-hole logging unit mounted on the vehicle and stipulated to have a value of $41,687.95. Acculog claimed that the destruction of the van and equipment resulted in a loss of profits estimated by it at over $33,000. On the day of the fire Acculog did not carry a fire extinguisher in its van.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1984
1 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
57.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of Utah

Mark Pratt v. City Council City Riverton Mark Pratt v. City Council City Riverton
1981
Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission
1994
Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
1954
Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union
1986
Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande
1951
Richard Rousay v. Board Review Industrial Richard Rousay v. Board Review Industrial
1987