"A Statistical Definition of Value": A Critical Comment (Letters to the Editor)
Appraisal Journal 2003, July, 71, 3
-
-
5.0 • 1 Rating
-
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
In Max Kummerow's above referenced Journal article (October 2002), he argues against traditional verbal definitions of market value and instead favors a statistical definition of value. Some of the issues related to "thinking statistically" about definitions and valuations were analyzed in earlier works by Kummerow (1) and Colwell. (2) There are a number of important points in these articles, especially in Kummerow's, but it will be argued here that he has drawn too far-reaching conclusions in his most recent 2002 article. Main arguments and conclusions in Kummerow (2000) (3)
Comments on "Contingent Valuation: Not an Appropriate Valuation Tool" (Letters to the Editor) (Letter to the Editor)
2006
Data-driven Retailing
2022
Managing Risk and Uncertainty
2015
Value in a Changing Built Environment
2017
Price Sensitivity for Electronic Entertainment
2005
The Quest for a Science of Accounting
2021
Cross-Examination at a Jury Trial. (Features).
2003
Three Approaches?(Real Estate Appraisal) (Reprint)
2007
Valuing First Nation Land Claims and Other Historical Damages.
2006
The Timing of Development Revealed by the Market: An Options Approach (Real Estate Appraisal)
2004
The Ongoing Evolution of Appraising Residential Properties: A New Edition for a New Millennium (Appraisal Institute)
2007
A Practical Tool to Assist in Analyzing Risk Associated with Income Capitalization Approach Valuation Or Investment Analysis (Features; Excel Model)
2003