Cable Operators' Fifth Amendment Claims Applied to Digital Must-Carry.
Federal Communications Law Journal 2006, April, 58, 2
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
I. INTRODUCTION As we face the widespread transition from analog to digital television, arguments are being made with increasing frequency by organizations such as the National Cable Television Association ("NCTA") that regulations like digital must-carry violate cable operators' Fifth Amendment rights. (1) These arguments have been made in the past, although most cases have failed to reach the Fifth Amendment claims by deciding the issues solely on First Amendment grounds. (2) And yet, without a clear understanding of the extent of the property rights held by cable operators, and the relationship between such property rights and speech rights, the legal analysis of such claims will remain incomplete.
Tethering the Administrative State: The Case Against Chevron Deference for FCC Jurisdictional Claims.
2011
FCC Authority Post-Comcast: Finding a Happy Medium in the Net Neutrality Debate.
2011
State Action Immunity, Municipalities, And the Unique Case of Eminent Domain.
2008
New Challenges of Chinese Copyright Law in the Digital Age : A Comparative Copyright Analysis of ISP Liability, Fair Use and Sports Telecasts
2011
The Telecommunications Economy and Regulation As Coevolving Complex Adaptive Systems: Implications for Federalism.
2007
Transformation: The 1996 Act Reshapes Radio (Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Years Later Symposium)
2006
Keeping the Internet Neutral? Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate.
2007
Securing the Freedom of the Communications Revolution (Introduction)
2005
Spectrum Wars: The Policy and Technology Debate (Book Review)
2004
The Two-Step Evidentiary and Causation Quandary for Medium-Specific Laws Targeting Sexual and Violent Content: First Proving Harm and Injury to Silence Speech, Then Proving Redress and Rehabilitation Through Censorship.
2008