Challenges to Ethics Review in Health Research (Canada) Challenges to Ethics Review in Health Research (Canada)

Challenges to Ethics Review in Health Research (Canada‪)‬

Health Law Review 2009, Spring-Summer, 17, 2-3

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

"Whereas Parliament believes that health research should ... take into consideration ethical issues ...." (1) The legislation creating the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) in 2000 specifically mentioned ethics in the preamble (as noted above). This historic legislation first led to the inclusion of an ethics member in boards across the Institutes and the creation of an Ethics Office within CIHR. Prior to the creation of the CIHR, the Medical Research Council of Canada (MRC) had mandated ethics review and provided guidelines to researchers since 1978. (2) Indeed, it was the MRC that provided the initial leadership in the creation of a Tri-Council committee to prepare the 1998 Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. (3) This Statement is unique in that all ethics review of research involving human beings, whether in the social sciences, the humanities, engineering or the pure sciences, were regrouped together. While well-intended, logical and unifying, this approach has had unintended consequences in the social sciences and the humanities. (4) The National Council on Ethics in Human Research created in 1989 has as its mandate "to provide leadership in advancing the knowledge and practice of the ethical conduct of research involving humans through advice, guidance and education to stakeholders." (5) Yet, in spite of all this guidance in health research ethics, there are problems concerning the need to share and access data as exemplified by the report of the CIHR's task force on privacy. (6) The other federal initiative that came to fruition after a decade of discussion and a Royal Commission is the law on assisted human reproduction and related research. (7) Again, the principles underscoring this legislation mention Parliament's "ethical concerns" as justifying certain prohibitions. (8) This legislation has far-reaching potential, well-beyond the prohibited criminal activities. Indeed, the federal regulatory powers extend to the Agency created by the Act, which has amongst its objectives to identify ethical issues (s. 18(1)) and to foster the application of ethical principles (s. 22). (9)

GENRE
Health, Mind & Body
RELEASED
2009
March 22
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
15
Pages
PUBLISHER
Health Law Institute
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
75.3
KB

More Books by Health Law Review

Decision-Making Processes Regarding Cancer Technologies: A Review (Canada) Decision-Making Processes Regarding Cancer Technologies: A Review (Canada)
2008
Exploiting the Fiduciary Relationship: The Physician As Information Intermediary in Assisted Human Reproduction (Canada) Exploiting the Fiduciary Relationship: The Physician As Information Intermediary in Assisted Human Reproduction (Canada)
2009
Submission to Standing Committee on Health Bill 52, Health Information Amendment Act, 2009 April 24, 2009 (Alberta) Submission to Standing Committee on Health Bill 52, Health Information Amendment Act, 2009 April 24, 2009 (Alberta)
2009
Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand? Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand?
2009
Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research Minimal Risk and Large-Scale Biobank and Cohort Research
2009
Ethical Challenges and Evolving Practices in Research on Ethics in Health Research Ethical Challenges and Evolving Practices in Research on Ethics in Health Research
2009