Comments on "You Can't Get the Value Right if You Get the Rights Wrong" (Letter to the Editor) Comments on "You Can't Get the Value Right if You Get the Rights Wrong" (Letter to the Editor)

Comments on "You Can't Get the Value Right if You Get the Rights Wrong" (Letter to the Editor‪)‬

Appraisal Journal 2009, Summer, 77, 3

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

We, the cosigners of this response, read with great interest the article by David Lennhoff, MAI, SRA, entitled "You Can't Get the Value Right If You Get the Rights Wrong" (Winter 2009). The following comments are not an official position of the Maricopa County Assessor's Office, but are a reflection of the thoughts and concerns we have over what is being proposed in the article. The premise of the article appears to be that single-tenant, built-to-suit (or custom) commercial real estate can be overvalued if an appraiser focuses solely on property-specific factors, rather than general market forces, to estimate market value. The article then goes on to assert that "the best support for the components of both the sales comparison approach and the components of the income capitalization approach is second-generation space." To automatically default to valuing first-generation space as if it were second-generation space ignores the market's acceptance of the property.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2009
June 22
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
27
Pages
PUBLISHER
The Appraisal Institute
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
277.4
KB
Going Concern Valuation Going Concern Valuation
2012
Comments on "You Can't Get the Value Right if You Get the Rights Wrong" (Letters to  the Editor) Comments on "You Can't Get the Value Right if You Get the Rights Wrong" (Letters to  the Editor)
2010
Comments on "Price Versus Fundamentals--from Bubbles to Distressed Markets" (Letters TO THE Editor) (Letter to the Editor) Comments on "Price Versus Fundamentals--from Bubbles to Distressed Markets" (Letters TO THE Editor) (Letter to the Editor)
2011
Comments on "Relationships Between the Overall Property and Its Parts, And the Three Approaches to Value" (Letter to the Editor) Comments on "Relationships Between the Overall Property and Its Parts, And the Three Approaches to Value" (Letter to the Editor)
2009
Foreclosure Markets--Wholesale Or Retail?(Residential APPRAISING) Foreclosure Markets--Wholesale Or Retail?(Residential APPRAISING)
2008
Value in a Changing Built Environment Value in a Changing Built Environment
2017
Cross-Examination at a Jury Trial. (Features). Cross-Examination at a Jury Trial. (Features).
2003
Three Approaches?(Real Estate Appraisal) (Reprint) Three Approaches?(Real Estate Appraisal) (Reprint)
2007
Valuing First Nation Land Claims and Other Historical Damages. Valuing First Nation Land Claims and Other Historical Damages.
2006
The Timing of Development Revealed by the Market: An Options Approach (Real Estate Appraisal) The Timing of Development Revealed by the Market: An Options Approach (Real Estate Appraisal)
2004
The Ongoing Evolution of Appraising Residential Properties: A New Edition for a New Millennium (Appraisal Institute) The Ongoing Evolution of Appraising Residential Properties: A New Edition for a New Millennium (Appraisal Institute)
2007
A Practical Tool to Assist in Analyzing Risk Associated with Income Capitalization Approach Valuation Or Investment Analysis (Features; Excel Model) A Practical Tool to Assist in Analyzing Risk Associated with Income Capitalization Approach Valuation Or Investment Analysis (Features; Excel Model)
2003