Cruz v. Homebase Cruz v. Homebase

Cruz v. Homebase

83 CAL.APP.4TH 160, 83 CAL.APP.4TH 160, 99 CAL.RPTR.2D 435, 83 CAL.APP.4TH 935, 99 CAL.RPTR.2D 435, 83 CAL.APP.4TH 935, 2000.CA.0042673, 00 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 7043, 00 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 7043

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Where a jury hearing a store patrons claims for battery, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution found for the patron on the battery claim, but hung on the others, it was proper thereafter to try only the false imprisonment and malicious prosecution claims to a second jury, with appropriate admonitions about the prior battery verdict. A corporation is not deemed to ratify misconduct, and thus become liable for punitive damages, unless its officer, director, or managing agent actually knew about the misconduct and its malicious character. A "managing agent" is an employee with authority to establish corporate policy, that is, the broad principles and rules of general application which govern corporate conduct.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
August 21
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
10
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
69.1
KB
Mcminn v. Harrison Mcminn v. Harrison
1933
Knauss v. Seventh-Day Adventist Association Knauss v. Seventh-Day Adventist Association
1948
Mile High Fence Co. v. Radovich Mile High Fence Co. v. Radovich
1971
Schwalb v. Connely Schwalb v. Connely
1947
Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co. Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
2009
K.C. Multimedia K.C. Multimedia
2009
United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land
1999
Casey v. Murray Casey v. Murray
1951
Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue Cross of California Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue Cross of California
2000
An Ocracoke Affair An Ocracoke Affair
2011
People v. Harris People v. Harris
2000
A Pittsburgh Caper A Pittsburgh Caper
2011