Great Northern Railway Company Et Al. v. Merchants Elevator Company. Great Northern Railway Company Et Al. v. Merchants Elevator Company.

Great Northern Railway Company Et Al. v. Merchants Elevator Company‪.‬

42 S. CT. 477, 259 U.S. 285, 66 L. ED. 943, 1922.SCT.40339

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This action was brought by the Merchants Elevator Company in a state court of Minnesota against the Great Northern Railway Company and the Director General to recover $80 alleged to have been exacted in violation of the carriers tariff. That sum had been demanded by the carrier, under Rule 10 of its tariff, as a reconsignment charge, at the rate of $5 a car, for sixteen cars of corn shipped from points in Iowa and Nebraska to Willmar, Minnesota, and after inspection there rebilled to Anoka, a station beyond. The tariff rate from the points of origin via Willmar to Anoka was the same as to Willmar. Willmar had been named as destination in the original bill of lading, only because it is the place at which grain coming into the State by this route is inspected and graded under the laws of Minnesota and of the United States; and the carrier knew, or should have known, that fact. Immediately after inspection disposition orders were given and the original bills of lading were surrendered in exchange for billing to Anoka. Rule 10 read:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1922
May 29
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
79.2
KB
Brown Et Al. v. Board Education Topeka Et Al. Brown Et Al. v. Board Education Topeka Et Al.
1955
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
United States v. Michener United States v. Michener
1947
Goss Et Al. v. Lopez Et Al. Goss Et Al. v. Lopez Et Al.
1975
Tinker Et Al. v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Et Al. Tinker Et Al. v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Et Al.
1969