Haseltine v. Central Bank Springfield Haseltine v. Central Bank Springfield

Haseltine v. Central Bank Springfield

22 S. CT. 49, 183 U.S. 130, 46 L. ED. 117, 1901.SCT.40278

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The motion to dismiss must be granted. We have frequently held that a judgment reversing that of the court below, and remanding the case for further proceedings, is not one to which a writ of error will lie. The case of Mower v. Fletcher, 114 U.S. 127, is not in point, as the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State remanded that case to the inferior court with an order to enter a specified judgment, nothing being left to the judicial discretion of the court below. A like ruling was made in Atherton v. Fowler, 91 U.S. 143, and Commissioners of Tippecanoe County v. Lucas, 93 U.S. 108.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1901
December 2
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
61.9
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of the United States

Brown Et Al. v. Board Education Topeka Et Al. Brown Et Al. v. Board Education Topeka Et Al.
1955
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
United States v. Michener United States v. Michener
1947
Goss Et Al. v. Lopez Et Al. Goss Et Al. v. Lopez Et Al.
1975
Tinker Et Al. v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Et Al. Tinker Et Al. v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Et Al.
1969