Matheson V. State Matheson V. State
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Gary Alan Matheson maintains the State failed to prove that an alert by Razor, a narcotics detection dog in service to the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, furnished probable cause to search his vehicle. He advanced that position during his prosecution for drug offenses in a motion to suppress the contraband discovered and seized during the search. When the circuit court denied the motion, Matheson pleaded no contest to three counts of possessing a controlled substance and one count of possessing drug paraphernalia. He reserved his right to appeal the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress. We reverse.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
August 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
13
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
60.9
KB
Lester v. State Lester v. State
2005
Harris v. State Harris v. State
2005
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co. Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co.
2005
Snyder v. City Council of the City of Palmetto Snyder v. City Council of the City of Palmetto
2005
Smith v. State Smith v. State
2005
State v. Taylor State v. Taylor
2005